Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madison Sieg vs Ena Shibahara Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sieg vs Shibahara analysis and find out who is favored!
Madison Sieg vs Ena Shibahara Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sieg 1 - 0 Shibahara
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sieg has won 45.16% of points on his second serve, while Shibahara has won 53.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sieg, in recent form, has won 53.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shibahara has won 56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.04% and 39.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sieg has saved 51.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shibahara has saved 56.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sieg has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 38/ 28), with Shibahara winning 68.52% (W/L 37/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 47/ 37). Shibahara has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.46% of matches (W/L 38/ 27), where as Shibahara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sieg winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sieg winning 2 and Shibahara winning 0. The last match between Sieg and Shibahara was at the W25 Saskatoon, 20-07-2022, Second, Hard with Madison Sieg getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sieg and Shibahara have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sieg winning 0 times and Shibahara 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sieg winning 0, and Shibahara 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sieg has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.52 while Shibahara has played against players with an average rank of 212.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sieg has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shibahara has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sieg has converted 52.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shibahara has converted 48.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
312
Rank
312
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
279
Rank
279
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (79-60)
Career Total W/L
58% (114-82)
46% (11-13)
YTD W/L
78% (28-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$28,143
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madison Sieg | Ena Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) | 65% (58/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (22/39) | 53% (31/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 39% (12/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (46/89) | 44% (29/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Madison Sieg
Player
Ena Shibahara
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madison Sieg | Ena Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (11/13) | 78% (28/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (24/28) | 71% (59/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (228/253) | 57% (450/342) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 78% (25/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 135 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:27 | 1:44:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.63 | 224.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1070/1597) | 64% (1594/2504) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (600/1070) | 66% (1052/1594) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (238/527) | 54% (491/910) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (93/176) | 48% (148/306) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (672/1499) | 45% (1164/2588) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (11/12) | 78% (28/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 78% (28/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 93% (28/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 7% (28/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 25% (8/2) |
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Madison Sieg
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Madison Sieg
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
87%
(
75 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Madison Sieg
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Madison Sieg
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Ena Shibahara
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aneta Kladivova
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Ena Shibahara
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Emina Bektas
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Valeria Savinykh
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
84%
(
43 of
51)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Naho Sato
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sieg Vs Shibahara Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
